What constitutes an offense for a public servant regarding a victim's pseudonym?

The correct choice emphasizes the critical nature of protecting a victim's privacy when it comes to sensitive information. Knowingly disclosing a victim's name, address, or phone number to unauthorized individuals directly violates privacy laws and can put the victim at risk, especially in cases involving family violence or other crimes where the victim's safety may be compromised. This action reflects a breach of trust and responsibility expected from public servants, who are sworn to uphold the law while ensuring the safety and confidentiality of vulnerable individuals.

The other choices address important aspects of serving victims but do not specifically constitute an offense regarding the handling of a victim's pseudonym. For instance, failing to notify the victim about their rights, while a significant oversight, does not involve the unauthorized disclosure of sensitive information and thus does not carry the same implications for the victim's safety. Similarly, using the victim's pseudonym in official reports without consent could be problematic, but it does not equate to the severe violation of outright disclosing personal information. Lastly, delaying the processing of victims' requests for information speaks to inefficiency or procedural issues rather than an offense directly related to the misuse of a victim's personal identifiers.